We endorse Lindsey LaPointe.
“As a legislator (who came from social work and worked previously worked at a state agency), I have long thought that all too often legislators ignore implementation. Legislators must play a role in being a part of and monitoring implementation.
For my part, I will be involved in and following the homeless outreach part of the transit bill since I do a lot of this policy, budget, community and constitution service work.”
Read Lindsey LaPointe’ responses to our 2026 questionnaire
What types of transportation do you use during an average week, and how has this shaped your view of transportation policy?
In any given week, I use a car (in particular around the district), CTA blue line, Metra (Milwaukee District North line) and walking. In the summer, I bike in the district and on the greater far Northwest side. My own modes of transit have shaped by view that we need multiple options of transit. I do everything I can to avoid taking my car downtown, to I an allude traffic and parking issues, in addition to multi tasking while in transit. Spending consistent time on public transit reminds me that it needs to be on time, clean and accessible to people with physical disabilities. All too often, it's none of these things.
What are some transportation challenges in your district?
Automobile congestion in certain intersections at certain times of day; safety for bicycles, pedestrians, quality of ride issues for public transportation customers, including people experiencing homelessness living at transit centers (do to inadequate homeless services and a lack of affordable housing). Finally, accessibility for people with disabilities is also an issue.
The Illinois Department of Transportation (“IDOT”) plays a significant role in transportation throughout the state, in Chicago, and Cook County. What is your opinion on their role with the Chicago Department of Transportation, Cook County Department of Transportation and Highways, local communities, and the impact that has?
I am of the opinion that IDOT has been far too focused on roads and vehicle transportation when "transportation" should be inclusive and multi modal. I'm hopeful that under the new leadership of Gia Biagi, IDOT will come to reflect the true expansiveness of its name.
How do you view the Illinois General Assembly’s role in setting IDOT’s priorities for public transit, passenger rail, and strengthening accessibility in transportation?
The Illinois General Assembly's role is critical to 1) act as a voice for the people (e.g., meeting with constituent groups, advocates, policy/planning professional), 2) provide funding for multiple modes of transportation via IDOT/state budget, and 3)play an oversight role.
The Illinois Department of Transportation (“IDOT”) plays a significant role in transportation throughout the state and in Chicago. What is your opinion on their relationship with the Chicago Department of Transportation, local communities, and the impact that has?
Although I have been less involved in this nitty gritty policy making as I'm not currently on a transportation committee or any related appropriations committee, it is clear that IDOT has been way to focused on roads for vehicles vs any other form of transit. I think IDOT is missing a big opportunity to think about transportation more comprehensively and work with CDOT and local communities and advocacy groups to expand safe and quality transit options (including pedestrian and bike options and safety). The impact of this lack of comprehensive thinking so far has resulted in car centric infrastructure.
How do you view the Illinois General Assembly’s role in setting IDOT’s priorities for public transit, passenger rail, and strengthening accessibility in transportation?
The Illinois General Assembly's role is critical to 1) act as a voice for the people (e.g., meeting with constituent groups, advocates, policy/planning professional), 2) provide funding for multiple modes of transportation via IDOT/state budget, and 3)play an oversight role.
States like Colorado, Minnesota, Virginia have passed legislation that has shifted their transportation infrastructure spending towards projects that prioritize safety, transit and cycling, and greenhouse gas mitigation. What’s your position on Illinois’ current transportation infrastructure spending, and if you could change anything, what would it be?
Global warming is an existential threat and policies that address this are a priority. I support improvements in all categories mentioned for reasons of both environment, economic development and full access to transportation for people with disabilities.
This fall, the Illinois General Assembly passed a historic investment in transit operations – as well as significant governance reforms in the establishment of the Northern Illinois Transit Authority. How do you view the Assembly’s role in ensuring both the short- and long-term success of this legislation?
As a legislator (who came from social work and worked previously worked at a state agency), I have long thought that all too often legislators ignore implementation. Legislators must play a role in being a part of and monitoring implementation. For my part, I will be involved in and following the homeless outreach part of the transit bill since I do a lot of this policy, budget, community and constitution service work. I worked with Thresholds and colleagues to get this component into the bill, however there was an error in the final timeline (it should be 6 months and 6 months, not 12 months and 12 months) so we will address this in a transit trailer bill.
What is your position on investing to expand passenger rail service in Illinois, including the development of high-speed rail?
I am enthusiastically in favor of it for all regions in our state.
Federal funding for Illinois transportation projects – such as the Red Line Extension and Red-Purple Modernization projects – has come under threat from the Trump administration. How can legislators shore up funding for critical infrastructure projects under a hostile federal climate?
We are overdue to transform our tax structure in Illinois away from regressivity and towards progressivity. I am organizing with a bicameral group of colleagues, both inside and outside of the House and Senate Progress Caucuses to do just that. It's always been important, but it's a key way we will get through the next three years.
Read Lindsey LaPointe’ responses to our 2024 questionnaire
What types of transportation do you use during an average week, and how has this shaped your view of transportation policy?
In a typical week, I utilize my own vehicle, walking and public transit (primarily Metra to get downtown). In the warmer months, I bike on a weeky basis. My active use of various modes of transportation has given me good perspective on the ongoing need for quality, safe, accessible, affordable and on time transit options. I am lucky to live in an area (Montrose an Cicero) with the CTA blueline, various bus routes and three Metra stops within walking distance. This hyper local area however, is not bike or pedestrian friendly. This personal and hyper local experience drives me towards policies that create more safe, affordbale, accessible, quality and on time options for people throughout the lifespan.
What are some transportation challenges in your district?
The far Northwest side of Chicago is car centric, despite the bevy of public transit options. Here are challenges I see: Drivers do not stop for pedestrians, lack of pedestrian safety infrastructure, lack of bicycle infrastructure, lack of driver awareness for anyone but drivers, car congestion at specific intersections, lack of cleanliness and "on time" scheduling of CTA buses and trains. We also have issues with people living unhoused at the Jefferson Park Transit Center and the Irving Park transit hub, which I have been actively involved for the past three years through a social service lens (vs. criminalization). Finally, we have severe cleanliness and pedestrian safety issues at the Irving Park Transit hub (i.e., "the pigeon problem") which we have created a work group for and procured $900K in capital dollars.
How can the State of Illinois address the impending combined $700 million fiscal cliff facing the CTA, Metra, and Pace in a way that ensures sustained and adequate funding for the future?
This will be a serious issue in the next 2.5 years. I know right now, the main advocates and stakeholders are educating and socializing the fiscal cliff and ideas. Policy makers have to be ready to look at all of the ideas coming out of the planning process with the north star of our need to maintain (and build up) a quality and affordable transit system in our region to provide mulitple options and to decrease private vehicle use.
A federal rule allows for states to flex up to 50% of federal highway funds towards transit instead. New Jersey currently flexes 15%, and California flexes 12% compared to Illinois at just under 3%. Would you make any changes to this amount, and if so why?
Although I have been less involved in these nitty-gritty policy discussions in Illinois, this seems like a no brainer option. Illinois and IDOT is way to focused on private vehicles as the main form of transportation and we are way overdue for investing in other options. Seeing the percentages from other states is telling. We should get this percentage up.
The Illinois Department of Transportation (“IDOT”) plays a significant role in transportation throughout the state and in Chicago. What is your opinion on their relationship with the Chicago Department of Transportation, local communities, and the impact that has?
Although I have been less involved in this nitty gritty policy making as I'm not currently on a transportation committee or any related appropriations committee, it is clear that IDOT has been way to focused on roads for vehicles vs any other form of transit. I think IDOT is missing a big opportunity to think about transportation more comprehensively and work with CDOT and local communities and advocacy groups to expand safe and quality transit options (including pedestrian and bike options and safety). The impact of this lack of comprehensive thinking so far has resulted in car centric infrastructure.
How do you view the Illinois General Assembly’s role in setting IDOT’s priorities for public transit, passenger rail, and strengthening accessibility in transportation?
As a body that has a role in overseeing IDOT and a boatload of funds, the ILGA should be very involved in setting IDOT'S priorities.
What is your position on IDOT’s current proposals for rebuilding North Du Sable Lake Shore Drive?
I am in support of [Rep. Kam Buckner’s] resolution and am an official co-sponsor.